Tuesday, September 8, 2009

'Safety net' hospitals fear they won't survive health-care reform

CHICAGO — Janie Johnson has no health insurance, so when she cut her toe while giving herself a pedicure, she limped to the emergency room at one of Chicago's safety net hospitals and waited her turn.
"I'm 44, but I probably look about 55 right now," Johnson said in Stroger Hospital's emergency department, where more than 100 patients sat waiting. Urgent cases, from chest pains to gunshot wounds, are rushed to doctors first. Johnson was glad to have somewhere to go for health care.

"I don't know what I would do" without the hospital, she said. "My health would probably get worse."

To all the knotty issues involved in health-care overhaul, add one more: The proposals in Congress may threaten the funding and future of the nation's already-struggling safety net hospitals.

It's an irony that hospital leaders are expressing quietly as Congress reconvenes this week to take up health care again. Hospital leaders support expanding insurance coverage to more Americans, but they worry that financing the expansion will cause some teetering urban hospitals to deteriorate and close.

They point to Massachusetts, the laboratory for health-care overhaul, where one safety net hospital, Boston Medical Center, is suing the state, claiming it's covering too much of the cost for expanding coverage. Another safety net standby, Cambridge Health Alliance, has closed health centers and cut services; its Somerville Hospital no longer keeps patients overnight.

"It looks like a national plan will be modeled on Massachusetts, and it's a disaster for poor people," said Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, Harvard Medical School professor and a doctor at Cambridge Hospital.

"The insurance offered doesn't cover everyone," she said. "It's filled with gaps like co-payments and deductibles. Patients can't afford it, so they turn to the public sector and the public sector isn't there anymore."

Funding cuts feared

What worries Woolhandler and others are proposals to finance national reform that gradually would reduce payments to hospitals handling more than their share of uninsured patients. One proposal would reduce these funds — called DSH payments for "disproportionate share hospital" — by $20 billion, in three large annual chunks starting in 2017.

(2 of 3)

Nashville company starts work on hospital in ChinaWhen a Model No Longer Works, It’s Time to Adapt