Monday, September 7, 2009

Politics paralyze U.S. labor board

WASHINGTON — Another Labor Day, another year of dysfunction in the agency that's supposed to protect workers from unfair labor practices and to referee clashes between unions and management.
The enduring stalemate at the National Labor Relations Board, the longest in its history, comes as evidence that elections don't always settle political tugs-of-war. Ten months after the election of a president and Congress from the same party, no end is in sight to the deadlock.

Decisions are stalled on dozens of disputes that could set labor-management policies for decades to come. Can employers prohibit employees from using the company's e-mail system to send union-related messages? Where may union members distribute literature at work sites? What about organizing a union by simply signing cards instead of having a secret-ballot election?

These matters and more are going nowhere because the board, since January 2008, has had one lonely Democrat, one lonely Republican and a political stalemate over three empty seats.

"The only cases they are getting out are the pure vanilla cases, where it's abundantly clear the case should go one way," said former board Chairman Robert Battista, a Bush appointee who now is an attorney in private practice.

The problem began when the Democratic-controlled Senate refused to fill the vacant seats during President George W. Bush's final year in office, angered over a series of board rulings that Democrats considered anti-labor.

Those vacancies have lingered into President Barack Obama's first term, despite the Democrats' control of the White House and Congress. Obama nominated three new members to sit on the board last month, but the U.S. Chamber of Commerce quickly demanded a rare hearing on one of them, former union lawyer Craig Becker, calling his views "out of the mainstream." The chamber is a powerful lobby that regularly does battle with unions and is influential with many lawmakers, particularly Republicans.

It's not clear when lawmakers will consider the appointments or whether a hearing will be scheduled. Given the likelihood that an Obama board would reverse several Bush-era precedents, Republicans may be in no rush.

(2 of 2)

Investor Report: Wind EnergyLabor Department boosts inspections